%% This document created by Scientific Notebook (R) Version 3.5 \documentclass{article} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=LATEX.DLL} %TCIDATA{Version=5.00.0.2606} %TCIDATA{} %TCIDATA{BibliographyScheme=Manual} %TCIDATA{Created=Wednesday, September 30, 1998 11:01:54} %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Sunday, October 03, 2004 16:40:44} %TCIDATA{} %TCIDATA{} %TCIDATA{} %TCIDATA{Language=American English} %TCIDATA{CSTFile=Exam.cst} %TCIDATA{PageSetup=72,72,72,72,0} %TCIDATA{AllPages= %F=36,\PARA{038
\hfill \thepage}
%}
\input{tcilatex}
\begin{document}
\section{Exam}
\section{Text}
\textbf{\Large Stockholms Universitet, Statistisk -- Finansiell statistik}
\medskip
\textbf{Examinator}: P\"{a}r Stockhammar/Mikael M\"{o}ller
\textbf{Godk\"{a}nt}: F\"{o}r godk\"{a}nd hemtentamen kr\"{a}vs godk\"{a}nt p%
\aa\ alla tal. Ett tal \"{a}r godk\"{a}nt om det erh\aa llit 8 po\"{a}ng av
10 m\"{o}jliga.
\textbf{Rest}: Om mer \"{a}n 25 och mindre \"{a}n 40 po\"{a}ng erh\aa lls f%
\aa r f\"{o}rnyad inl\"{a}mning g\"{o}ras fram till dagen innan ordinarie
tentamensdag.
L\"{o}sningarna skall vara v\"{a}l motiverade och l\"{a}tta att f\"{o}lja.
Saknas motivering g\"{o}rs avdrag. Om antaganden och analys ej klart framg%
\aa r kan det bli fullt avdrag. Endast ett tal:s l\"{o}sning per pappersark.
Uppgiften skall redovisas skriftligt och l\"{a}mnas till \"{o}vningsl\"{a}%
raren. Inl\"{a}mning sker i samband med undervisningen eller i brevl\aa dan
utanf\"{o}r hissarna p\aa\ plan 7 i B-huset. Senaste inl\"{a}mningsdag
meddelas av \"{o}vningsl\"{a}raren och uppgiften skall vara godk\"{a}nd
innan ordinarie tentamen. F\"{o}r att bli godk\"{a}nd p\aa\ den
obligatoriska delen -- v\"{a}rd 2 po\"{a}ng -- m\aa ste alla inl\"{a}%
mningsuppgifter vara godk\"{a}nda innan ordinarie tentamenstillf\"{a}lle; om
detta ej \"{a}r uppfyllt m\aa ste den obligatoriska delen g\"{o}ras om n\"{a}%
sta termin. Det \"{a}r laborantens ansvar att ha kopia p\aa\ inl\"{a}mnad
uppgift om denna skulle f\"{o}rkomma.
\textbf{Observera}: Inl\"{a}mningsuppgiften l\"{a}mnas ej tillbaks. Inget
annat besked \"{a}n underk\"{a}nd/rest/godk\"{a}nd ges.
\bigskip
\subsection{Setup}
Title: Hemtentamen
Submit:Click to Grade
$\limfunc{nplaces}(x,n)=1.0\left\lfloor 10^{n}x+0.5\right\rfloor /10^{n}$
$\limfunc{uniform}=\func{rand}(1000000)/1000000.0$
$\limfunc{svar}:=(\limfunc{accept},\limfunc{reject})$
$\limfunc{rejectarea}:=(\limfunc{outside},\limfunc{inside})$
Points: 10
CSTFile:Help
Choices: Break, Permute
Print Choices: a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h
\section{Question}
\section{Comment}
Grundl\"{a}ggande sannolikhetsl\"{a}ra: Klassisk sannolikhetsdefinition,
Kombinatorik, Betingad sannolikhet.
\section{Variant}
\subsection{Setup}
$n:=\func{rand}(6000,10000)$
$k:=\func{rand}(3,10)$
$\lambda :=\func{rand}(1,100)/10.0$
$p:=\limfunc{nplaces}(\frac{\lambda }{n},5)$
$\limfunc{svar}:=\limfunc{nplaces}(1-\func{PoissonDist}(k-1;\lambda ),3)$
\subsection{Statement}
Ett f\"{o}rs\"{a}kringsbolag s\"{a}ljer ansvarsf\"{o}rs\"{a}kringar. I f\"{o}%
rs\"{a}kringsportf\"{o}ljen finns $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
$ f\"{o}rs\"{a}kringar och erfarenheten har visat att sannolikheten f\"{o}r
att en s\aa dan f\"{o}rs\"{a}kring skall drabbas av skada \"{a}r under ett
\aa r $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p}{p}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p%
%EndExpansion
$. Best\"{a}m sannolikheten att portf\"{o}ljen ett \aa r drabbas av minst $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{k}{k}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
k%
%EndExpansion
$ skador.
\subsection{Solution}
S\"{a}tt%
\begin{eqnarray*}
X_{i} &=&\left\{
\begin{array}{cl}
1 & \text{om f\"{o}rs\"{a}kring }i\text{ drabbas av skada} \\
0 & \text{om f\"{o}rs\"{a}kring }i\text{ ej drabbas av skada}%
\end{array}%
\right. \quad i=1,2,\ldots ,%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate} }%
%BeginExpansion
n
%EndExpansion
\\
X &=&\sum_{i=1}^{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
}X_{i}=\text{antalet skador}
\end{eqnarray*}%
d\aa\ g\"{a}ller att $X\in Bin(%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
,%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p}{p}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p%
%EndExpansion
)$. S\"{o}kt sannolikhet kan nu skrivas%
\[
P(X\geq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{k}{k}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
k%
%EndExpansion
)=\sum_{i=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{k}{k}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
k%
%EndExpansion
}^{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
}\binom{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
}{i}%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p}{p}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p%
%EndExpansion
^{i}(1-%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p}{p}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p%
%EndExpansion
)^{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
-i}
\]%
men vi hamnar helt utanf\"{o}r binomialf\"{o}rdelningstabellen. Vi
approximerar d\"{a}rf\"{o}r med en Poissonf\"{o}rdelning och erh\aa ller d%
\aa\ att $Bin(%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
,%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p}{p}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p%
%EndExpansion
)\approx Po(%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
\times
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p}{p}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p%
%EndExpansion
)=Po(%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\lambda }{\lambda }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\lambda %
%EndExpansion
)$. Tabell ger nu att%
\[
P(X\geq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{k}{k}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
k%
%EndExpansion
)=1-%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\func{PoissonDist}(k-1;\lambda )}{\left( \func{stats}\func{poissonCDF}\left( \lambda \right) \right) \left( k-1\right) }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left( \func{stats}\func{poissonCDF}\left( \lambda \right) \right) \left( k-1\right) %
%EndExpansion
=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\limfunc{svar}}{\limfunc{svar}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\limfunc{svar}%
%EndExpansion
\text{.}
\]
\section{Variant}
\subsection{Setup}
$q_{1}:=\func{rand}(1,5)/10.0$
$q_{2}:=\func{rand}(10q_{1}+2,9)/10.0$
$p:=\func{rand}(35,45)/100.0$
$n:=\func{rand}(1000000,2000000)$
$\limfunc{svar}_{1}:=q_{1}p+q_{2}(1-p)$
$\limfunc{svar}_{2}:=q_{1}pn+q_{2}(1-p)n$
\subsection{Statement}
Varje h\"{o}st \"{a}r det stora kampanjer f\"{o}r att vaccinera sig mot \aa %
rets influensa. Erfarenheten visar att sannolikheten att f\aa\ influensan
efter vaccination \"{a}r $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{q_{1}}{q_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
q_{1}%
%EndExpansion
$ och utan vaccination \"{a}r den $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{q_{2}}{q_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
q_{2}%
%EndExpansion
$. Ett \aa r vaccineras $%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left\lfloor 100p\right\rfloor }{\left\lfloor 100p\right\rfloor }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left\lfloor 100p\right\rfloor %
%EndExpansion
$ procent av befolkningen.
\begin{enumerate}
\item Om en person dras helt slumpm\"{a}ssigt vad \"{a}r d\aa\ dennes
sannolikhet att f\aa\ influensan?
\item Vad \"{a}r det f\"{o}rv\"{a}ntade antalet smittade personer om
populationen best\aa r av $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
$ individer?
\item \"{A}r h\"{a}ndelserna att 'f\aa\ influensan' och 'bli vaccinerad'
oberoende h\"{a}ndelser?
\item Vad \"{a}r sannolikheten att en person som f\aa r influensan \"{a}r
vaccinerad?
\end{enumerate}
\subsection{Solution}
Nedanst\aa ende samband \"{a}r givna:%
\begin{eqnarray*}
P(\,I &\mid &V\,)=P(\text{Influensa givet Vaccinerad)}=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{q_{1}}{q_{1}}{evaluate} }%
%BeginExpansion
q_{1}
%EndExpansion
\\
P(\,I &\mid &\overline{V}\,)=P(\text{Influensa givet Ej Vaccinerad})=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{q_{2}}{q_{2}}{evaluate} }%
%BeginExpansion
q_{2}
%EndExpansion
\\
P(\,\bar{I} &\mid &V\,)=1-P(\,I\mid V\,)=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-q_{1}}{1-q_{1}}{evaluate} }%
%BeginExpansion
1-q_{1}
%EndExpansion
\\
P(\,\bar{I} &\mid &\overline{V}\,)=1-P(\,I\mid \overline{V}\,)=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-q_{2}}{1-q_{2}}{evaluate} }%
%BeginExpansion
1-q_{2}
%EndExpansion
\\
P(V) &=&%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p}{p}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p%
%EndExpansion
\quad P(\overline{V})=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-p}{1-p}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
1-p%
%EndExpansion
\end{eqnarray*}%
Med hj\"{a}lp av dessa erh\aa lls f\"{o}ljande:
\begin{enumerate}
\item sannolikheten f\"{o}r att en slumpm\"{a}ssigt tagen person f\aa r
influensan \"{a}r%
\begin{eqnarray*}
P(I) &=&P(\,I\mid V\,)P(V)+P(\,I\mid \overline{V}\,)P(\overline{V})= \\
&=&%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{q_{1}}{q_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
q_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\times
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p}{p}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p%
%EndExpansion
+%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{q_{2}}{q_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
q_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\times (%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-p}{1-p}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
1-p%
%EndExpansion
)=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\limfunc{svar}_{1}}{\limfunc{svar}_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\limfunc{svar}_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\text{.}
\end{eqnarray*}
\item det f\"{o}rv\"{a}ntade antalet smittade personer blir $=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\limfunc{svar}_{2}}{\limfunc{svar}_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\limfunc{svar}_{2}%
%EndExpansion
$
\item vi m\aa ste testa likheten $P(\,A\mid B\,)=P(A)$ f\"{o}r alla m\"{o}%
jliga kombinationer av\ $V$ och $I$. F\"{o}rst erh\aa lls%
\begin{eqnarray*}
P(\,I &\mid &V\,)=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{q_{1}}{q_{1}}{evaluate} }%
%BeginExpansion
q_{1}
%EndExpansion
\\
P(I) &=&%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\limfunc{svar}_{1}}{\left( \limfunc{svar}\right) 1}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left( \limfunc{svar}\right) 1%
%EndExpansion
\end{eqnarray*}%
och eftersom det g\"{a}ller
\[
P(\,I\mid V\,)\neq P(I)
\]%
\"{a}r de tv\aa\ h\"{a}ndelserna ej oberoende.
\item s\"{o}kt sannolikhet blir
\[
P(\,V\mid I\,)=\frac{P(\,I\mid V\,)P(V)}{P(I)}=\frac{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{q_{1}p}{pq_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
pq_{1}%
%EndExpansion
}{%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{q_{1}p+q_{2}(1-p)}{pq_{1}+q_{2}\left( 1-p\right) }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
pq_{1}+q_{2}\left( 1-p\right) %
%EndExpansion
}=%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\frac{q_{1}p}{q_{1}p+q_{2}(1-p)}}{p\frac{q_{1}}{pq_{1}+q_{2}\left( 1.0-1.0p\right) }}{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
p\frac{q_{1}}{pq_{1}+q_{2}\left( 1.0-1.0p\right) }%
%EndExpansion
\]
\end{enumerate}
\section{Variant}
\subsection{Setup}
$\mu :=\func{rand}(130,140)$
$\sigma :=\func{rand}(10,15)$
$v_{1}:=\func{rand}(110,120)$
$v_{2}:=\func{rand}(150,170)$
$m:=\func{rand}(45,55)$
$n_{1}:=\func{NormalDist}(1.0\times v_{1};\mu ,\sigma )$
$n_{2}:=\func{NormalDist}(1.0\times v_{2};\mu ,\sigma )$
$N:=\frac{m}{n_{1}}$
$x:=N\times n_{2}$
\subsection{Statement}
En kontrollant testar tegelpannors h\aa llfasthet. Dessa skall t\aa l en
vindstyrka som \"{a}r normalf\"{o}rdelad med v\"{a}ntev\"{a}rdet $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\mu }{\mu }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mu %
%EndExpansion
$ km/timme och standardavvikelsen $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\sigma }{\sigma }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\sigma %
%EndExpansion
$ km/timme. Vid ett vindtunnelexperiment simulerades vindhastigheter upp
till $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{v_{1}}{v_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
v_{1}%
%EndExpansion
$ km/timme och d\aa\ gick $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{m}{m}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
m%
%EndExpansion
$ tegelpannor s\"{o}nder. Hur m\aa nga tegelpannor ber\"{a}knas klara
vindhastigheter upp till $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{v_{2}}{v_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
v_{2}%
%EndExpansion
$ km/timme?
\subsection{Solution}
S\"{a}tt
\begin{eqnarray*}
X &=&\text{vindhastighet i km/timme} \\
\mu &=&%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\mu }{\mu }{evaluate} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mu
%EndExpansion
\\
\sigma &=&%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\sigma }{\sigma }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\sigma %
%EndExpansion
\end{eqnarray*}%
d\"{a}r $X\in N\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\mu }{\mu }{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mu %
%EndExpansion
,%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\sigma }{\sigma }{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
\sigma %
%EndExpansion
\right) $.
Enligt texten \"{a}r h\"{a}ndelserna $\left\{ X\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{v_{1}}{v_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
v_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\right\} $ och $\left\{
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{m}{m}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
m%
%EndExpansion
\text{ tegelpannor gick s\"{o}nder}\right\} $ ekvivalenta och d\"{a}rmed
\"{a}r deras sannolikheter lika
\[
P\left( X\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{v_{1}}{v_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
v_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\right) =P\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{m}{m}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
m%
%EndExpansion
\text{ tegelpannor gick s\"{o}nder}\right) \text{.}
\]%
Om vi antar att tegelpannorna g\aa r s\"{o}nder oberoende av varandra samt
att de alla har samma sannolikhet att g\aa\ s\"{o}nder (vi antar likformig f%
\"{o}rdelning) s\aa\ g\"{a}ller att
\[
P\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{m}{m}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
m%
%EndExpansion
\text{ tegelpannor gick s\"{o}nder}\right) =\frac{g}{m}=\frac{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{m}{m}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
m%
%EndExpansion
}{N}
\]%
d\"{a}r $N$ \"{a}r det totala antalet tegelpannor. Detta ger oss ekvationen
\[
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{1}}{n_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{1}%
%EndExpansion
=\frac{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{m}{m}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
m%
%EndExpansion
}{N}
\]%
ty $P\left( X\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{v_{1}}{v_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
v_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\right) =%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{1}}{n_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{1}%
%EndExpansion
$. Vi finner d\"{a}rf\"{o}r att $N=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{N}{N}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
N%
%EndExpansion
$ (sj\"{a}lvklart finns det ej en br\aa kdels-tegelpanna men eventuell
avrundning g\"{o}rs senare).
Om vi nu g\aa r tillbaks till texten s\aa\ finner vi att h\"{a}ndelserna $%
\left\{ X\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{v_{2}}{v_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
v_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\right\} $ och $\left\{ x\text{ tegelpannor g\aa r s\"{o}nder}\right\} $ ocks%
\aa\ \"{a}r ekvivalenta och detta ger ekvationen
\[
P\left( X\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{v_{2}}{v_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
v_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\right) =P\left( x\text{ tegelpannor gick s\"{o}nder}\right)
\]%
d\"{a}r $x$ \"{a}r antalet trasiga tegelpannor. Denna g\aa ng \"{a}r $N$ k%
\"{a}nd och vi erh\aa ller ekvationen
\[
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{2}}{n_{2}}{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{2}%
%EndExpansion
=\frac{x}{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{N}{N}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
N%
%EndExpansion
}
\]%
varur vi finner
\[
x=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{N}{N}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
N%
%EndExpansion
\times
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{2}}{n_{2}}{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{2}%
%EndExpansion
=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{x}{x}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
x%
%EndExpansion
\]%
Antalet tegelpannor som rider ut en storm med vindhastigheter p\aa\ upp till
$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{v_{2}}{v_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
v_{2}%
%EndExpansion
$ km/timme blir d\"{a}rf\"{o}r $N-x=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{N}{N}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
N%
%EndExpansion
-%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{x}{x}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
x%
%EndExpansion
$ vilket korrekt avrundat till $2$ decimalers noggranhet blir $%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\limfunc{nplaces}(N-x,2)}{%
%\begin{array}{cc}
%\left( \limfunc{nplaces}\right) \left( N-x\right) & 2\limfunc{nplaces}%
%\end{array}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
%
\begin{array}{cc}
\left( \limfunc{nplaces}\right) \left( N-x\right) & 2\limfunc{nplaces}%
\end{array}%
%EndExpansion
$.
Detta betyder att $%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left\lfloor N-x\right\rfloor }{\left\lfloor N-x\right\rfloor }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left\lfloor N-x\right\rfloor %
%EndExpansion
$ av $%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left\lceil N\right\rceil }{\left\lceil N\right\rceil }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left\lceil N\right\rceil %
%EndExpansion
$ tegelpannor kan anses klara en vindstyrka om $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{v_{2}}{v_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
v_{2}%
%EndExpansion
$ km/timme.
\section{Question}
\section{Comment}
Diskreta och kontinuerliga f\"{o}rdelningar
\section{Variant}
\subsection{Setup}
$\lambda :=\func{rand}(450,550)$
$\mu :=\frac{1.0}{\lambda }$
$n:=\func{rand}(5,15)$
$t_{1}:=\func{rand}(10,15)$
$t_{2}:=\func{rand}(1,t_{1}-1)$
\subsection{Statement}
Huddinge sjukhus kirurgiska enhet kan aldrig till\aa tas vara utan
elektricitet. Sjukhusets ledning planerar d\"{a}rf\"{o}r att ink\"{o}pa en
eller fler elgeneratorer som automatiskt kopplas in vid str\"{o}mavbrott.
Ledningen best\"{a}mmer sig f\"{o}r att tolka ordet 'aldrig' som att chansen
f\"{o}r att den kirurgiska avdelningen skall bli utan str\"{o}m f\aa r vara h%
\"{o}gst $1$ procent (av $100$ str\"{o}mavbrott f\aa r h\"{o}gst $1$ bli
totalt).
De modeller p\aa\ elgeneratorer som finns p\aa\ marknaden har alla en
medeltid mellan fel p\aa\ $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\lambda }{\lambda }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\lambda %
%EndExpansion
$ timmar. Best\"{a}m sannolikheten f\"{o}r ett totalt (\"{a}ven
generatorerna har slutat fungera) str\"{o}mavbrott p\aa\ kirurgiska
avdelningen i f\"{o}ljande fall:
\begin{enumerate}
\item en generator ink\"{o}ps och str\"{o}mmen f\"{o}rsvinner under $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{1}}{t_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{1}%
%EndExpansion
$ timmar en g\aa ng under \aa ret.
\item tv\aa\ generator ink\"{o}ps och str\"{o}mmen f\"{o}rsvinner under $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{1}}{t_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{1}%
%EndExpansion
$ timmar en g\aa ng under \aa ret. B\aa da generatorerna s\"{a}tts ig\aa ng
samtidigt.
\item en generator ink\"{o}ps och str\"{o}mmen f\"{o}rsvinner under $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{2}}{t_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{2}%
%EndExpansion
$ timmar $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
$ g\aa nger under \aa ret.
\item tv\aa\ generator ink\"{o}ps och str\"{o}mmen f\"{o}rsvinner under $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{2}}{t_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{2}%
%EndExpansion
$ timmar $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
$ g\aa nger under \aa ret. B\aa da generatorerna s\"{a}tts ig\aa ng
samtidigt.
\end{enumerate}
Ledning: Tid mellan fel kan approximeras med en exponentialf\"{o}rdelningen.
\subsection{Solution}
S\"{a}tt%
\begin{eqnarray*}
X_{i} &=&\text{tid mellan fel p\aa\ elgenerator }i\quad i=1,2 \\
\mu &=&\text{felintensiteten}=\text{antal fel per tidsenhet.}
\end{eqnarray*}%
d\"{a}r $X_{i}\in Exp(\mu )$, $i=1,2$ och $\mu =%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\mu }{\mu }{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mu %
%EndExpansion
$ \"{a}r generatorernas angivna felintensitet (antal fel per tidsenhet).
\begin{enumerate}
\item Den s\"{o}kta sannolikheten kan skrivas%
\[
P(X_{1}\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{1}}{t_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{1}%
%EndExpansion
)=1-e^{-%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\mu }{\mu }{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mu %
%EndExpansion
\times
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{1}}{t_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{1}%
%EndExpansion
}=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}}{1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}%
%EndExpansion
\]
\item Om str\"{o}mmen g\aa r startar vi b\aa da generatorerna p\aa\ en g\aa %
ng. Sannolikheten f\"{o}r att avdelningen skall bli utan str\"{o}m kan d\aa\ %
skrivas%
\[
P(\left\{ X_{1}\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{1}}{t_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\right\} \cap \left\{ X_{2}\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{1}}{t_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\right\} )=P(X_{1}\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{1}}{t_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{1}%
%EndExpansion
)P(X_{2}\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{1}}{t_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{1}%
%EndExpansion
)
\]%
ty avdelningen blir utan str\"{o}m f\"{o}rst n\"{a}r b\aa da har fallerat
och generatorerna kan anses fungera oberoende av varandra. S\"{o}kt
sannolikhet kan skrivas%
\[
P(\left\{ X_{1}\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{1}}{t_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\right\} \cap \left\{ X_{2}\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{1}}{t_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\right\} )=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}}{1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}%
%EndExpansion
\times
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}}{1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}%
%EndExpansion
=%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}\right) ^{2}}{\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}\right) ^{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{1}}\right) ^{2}%
%EndExpansion
\]
\item Sannolikheten f\"{o}r fel vid \textbf{ett} str\"{o}mavbrott om $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{2}}{t_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{2}%
%EndExpansion
$ timmar blir (j\"{a}mf\"{o}r 1. ovan)%
\[
p=P(X_{1}\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{2}}{t_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{2}%
%EndExpansion
)=1-e^{-%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\mu }{\mu }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mu %
%EndExpansion
\times
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{2}}{t_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{2}%
%EndExpansion
}=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}}{1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}%
%EndExpansion
\text{.}
\]%
S\"{a}tt%
\[
Y_{j}=\left\{
\begin{array}{cl}
1 & \text{utan str\"{o}m tillf\"{a}lle }j \\
0 & \text{annars}%
\end{array}%
\right.
\]%
och $Y=\sum Y_{j}=$ totala antalet fel under de $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
$ str\"{o}mavbrotten. Det g\"{a}ller att $Y\in Bin(%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
,p)$. Den s\"{o}kta sannolikheten kan nu skrivas%
\[
P(Y=0)=\binom{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
}{0}\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}}{1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}%
%EndExpansion
\right) ^{0}(1-%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}}{1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}%
%EndExpansion
)^{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
}=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{e^{-n\mu t_{2}}}{e^{-n\mu t_{2}}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
e^{-n\mu t_{2}}%
%EndExpansion
\]
\item I detta fall erh\aa ller vi%
\[
p=P(\left\{ X_{1}\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{2}}{t_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\right\} \cap \left\{ X_{2}\leq
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{t_{2}}{t_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
t_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\right\} )=%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}}{\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}%
%EndExpansion
\text{.}
\]%
I \"{o}vrigt som 3. varf\"{o}r%
\[
P(Y=0)=\binom{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
}{0}\left(
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}}{\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}%
%EndExpansion
\right) ^{0}\left( 1-%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}}{\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}%
%EndExpansion
\right) ^{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
}=%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{(1-\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2})^{n}}{\left( 1-\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}\right) ^{n}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left( 1-\left( 1-e^{-\mu t_{2}}\right) ^{2}\right) ^{n}%
%EndExpansion
\text{.}
\]
\end{enumerate}
\section{Question}
\section{Comment}
Konfidensintervall
\section{Variant}
\subsection{Setup}
$x:=\func{rand}(6400,6700)$
$s:=\func{rand}(3000,3200)$
$\alpha :=\func{rand}(\{0.01,0.02,0.05,0.1,0.2\})$
$n:=\func{rand}(15,29)$
$u:=x-\func{TInv}(0.5\alpha ;n-1)\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}$
$l:=x+\func{TInv}(0.5\alpha ;n-1)\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}$
$q:=\limfunc{nplaces}\left( \func{TInv}(1-0.5\alpha ;n-1)\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}%
,1\right) $
\subsection{Statement}
Ett f\"{o}rs\"{a}kringsbolag beh\"{o}ver veta medelskadan p\aa\ sina
vagnskadef\"{o}rs\"{a}kringar f\"{o}r att kunna s\"{a}tta en korrekt premie.
Tidigare erfarenheter har visat att dessa skadors f\"{o}rdelning kan
approximeras med en normalf\"{o}rdelning. Bolaget tar nu slumpm\"{a}ssigt ut
$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
$ f\"{o}rs\"{a}kringar som drabbats av skador och finner att medelv\"{a}rdet
av deras skador bel\"{o}per sig p\aa\ $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{x}{x}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
x%
%EndExpansion
$ kronor med en skattad standardavvikelse om $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{s}{s}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
s%
%EndExpansion
$ kronor. Konstruera ett $%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left\lfloor 100(1-\alpha )\right\rfloor }{100+\left\lfloor -100\alpha \right\rfloor }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
100+\left\lfloor -100\alpha \right\rfloor %
%EndExpansion
$ procentigt symmetriskt konfidensintervall f\"{o}r vagnskadeportf\"{o}ljens
medelskada. Redovisa gjorda antaganden.
\subsection{Solution}
S\"{a}tt%
\[
X_{i}=\text{skadestorlek f\"{o}rs\"{a}kring }i\quad i=1,2,\ldots ,%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
\text{.}
\]%
d\"{a}r $X_{i}\in N(\mu ,\sigma )$. Vi antar att de olika f\"{o}rs\"{a}%
kringarna drabbas av skada oberoende av varandra. Eftersom vi har ett litet
stickprov ($n<30$) och standardavvikelsen $\sigma $ \"{a}r ok\"{a}nd skall
vi anv\"{a}nda intervallet%
\begin{eqnarray*}
\bar{x}\pm t_{\alpha /2}(n-1)\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} &=&%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{x}{x}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
x%
%EndExpansion
\pm t_{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-0.5\alpha }{1.0-0.5\alpha }{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
1.0-0.5\alpha %
%EndExpansion
}(%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
-1)\frac{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{s}{s}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
s%
%EndExpansion
}{\sqrt{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
}} \\
&=&%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{x}{x}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
x%
%EndExpansion
\pm
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{q}{q}{evaluate} }%
%BeginExpansion
q
%EndExpansion
\\
&=&\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{l}{l}{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
l%
%EndExpansion
,%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{u}{u}{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
u%
%EndExpansion
\right) \text{.}
\end{eqnarray*}
\section{Variant}
\subsection{Setup}
$M:=\func{rand}(9000,11000)$
$n_{1}:=\func{rand}(350,450)$
$n_{2}:=n_{1}$
$p_{1}:=\func{rand}(50,70)/1000.0$
$p_{2}:=\func{rand}(15,40)/1000.0$
$\alpha :=\func{rand}(10,50)/1000.0$
$q:=\func{NormalInv}\left( 1-\frac{\alpha }{2.0};0,1\right) $
$l:=\limfunc{nplaces}(p_{1}-p_{2}-q\sqrt{\frac{p_{1}(1-p_{1})}{n_{1}}+\frac{%
p_{2}(1-p_{2})}{n_{2}}},3)$
$u:=\limfunc{nplaces}(p_{1}-p_{2}+q\sqrt{\frac{p_{1}(1-p_{1})}{n_{1}}+\frac{%
p_{2}(1-p_{2})}{n_{2}}},3)$
\subsection{Statement}
En legotillverkare av batterier till mobiltelefoner vill, f\"{o}re ink\"{o}%
p, testa tv\aa\ olika system f\"{o}r kvalitetskontroll. Man anv\"{a}nder de
tv\aa\ systemen p\aa\ tv\aa\ olika men i \"{o}vrigt tekniskt likv\"{a}rdiga
'linor'. En slumpm\"{a}ssigt utvald dag tar man slumpm\"{a}ssigt $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{1}}{n_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{1}%
%EndExpansion
$ batterier fr\aa n lina 1:s produktion och lika m\aa nga fr\aa n lina 2,
total produktion per lina \"{a}r $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{M}{M}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
M%
%EndExpansion
$ batterier. Man fann d\aa\ att proportionen defekta batterier blev $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{1}}{p_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{1}%
%EndExpansion
$ p\aa\ lina 1 och $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{2}}{p_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{2}%
%EndExpansion
$ p\aa\ lina 2. Bilda ett symmetriskt $%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left\lfloor 100(1-\alpha )\right\rfloor }{\left\lfloor 100-100\alpha \right\rfloor }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left\lfloor 100-100\alpha \right\rfloor %
%EndExpansion
$ procentigt konfidensintervall f\"{o}r skillnaden av proportionen defekta
mellan de tv\aa\ kvalitetskontrollsystemen. Svara med tre decimalers
noggranhet. Vilken rekommendation ger du?
\subsection{Solution}
S\"{a}tt%
\begin{eqnarray*}
X_{1i} &=&\left\{
\begin{array}{cl}
1 & \text{batteri }i\text{ lina 1 defekt} \\
0 & \text{annars}%
\end{array}%
\right. \\
X_{2j} &=&\left\{
\begin{array}{cl}
1 & \text{batteri }j\text{ lina 2 defekt} \\
0 & \text{annars}%
\end{array}%
\right.
\end{eqnarray*}%
Det g\"{a}ller nu att $X_{1}=\sum_{i=1}^{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{1}}{n_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{1}%
%EndExpansion
}X_{1i}\in Bin(%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{1}}{n_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{1}%
%EndExpansion
,p_{1})$ och $X_{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{2}}{n_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{2}%
%EndExpansion
}X_{2i}\in Bin(%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{2}}{n_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{2}%
%EndExpansion
,p_{2})$. Centrala gr\"{a}nsv\"{a}rdessatsen ger nu att%
\[
\bar{X}_{1}\approx N\left( p_{1},\frac{p_{1}(1-p_{1})}{n_{1}}\right) \text{
och }\bar{X}_{2}\approx N\left( p_{2},\frac{p_{2}(1-p_{2})}{n_{2}}\right)
\]%
ty $n_{2}p_{2}=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{2}}{n_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\times
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{2}}{p_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\approx
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{2}p_{2}}{n_{2}p_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{2}p_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\geq 5$ och $n_{2}(1-p_{2})=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{2}}{n_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\times
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{1-p_{2}}{1-p_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
1-p_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\approx
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{2}(1-p_{2})}{n_{2}\left( 1-p_{2}\right) }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{2}\left( 1-p_{2}\right) %
%EndExpansion
\geq 5$. Motsvarande g\"{a}ller f\"{o}r lina 1.
Ett $%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left\lfloor 100(1-\alpha )\right\rfloor }{\left\lfloor 100-100\alpha \right\rfloor }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left\lfloor 100-100\alpha \right\rfloor %
%EndExpansion
$ procentigt symmetriskt konfidensintervall f\"{o}r skillnaden $p_{1}-p_{2}$
kan nu allm\"{a}nt skrivas%
\[
I=\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\pm \lambda _{\alpha /2}\sqrt{\frac{p_{1}(1-p_{1})}{%
n_{1}}+\frac{p_{2}(1-p_{2})}{n_{2}}}\text{.}
\]%
H\"{a}rav f\"{o}ljer nu att%
\begin{eqnarray*}
I &=&%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{1}}{p_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{1}%
%EndExpansion
-%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{2}}{p_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\pm
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{q}{q}{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
q%
%EndExpansion
\sqrt{\frac{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{1}}{p_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{1}%
%EndExpansion
(1-%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{1}}{p_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{1}%
%EndExpansion
)}{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{1}}{n_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{1}%
%EndExpansion
}+\frac{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{2}}{p_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{2}%
%EndExpansion
(1-%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{2}}{p_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{2}%
%EndExpansion
)}{%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n_{2}}{n_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n_{2}%
%EndExpansion
}} \\
&=&%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{1}}{p_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{1}%
%EndExpansion
-%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{p_{2}}{p_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
p_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\pm
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{\frac{u-l}{2}}{0.5u-0.5l}{evaluatenum} }%
%BeginExpansion
0.5u-0.5l
%EndExpansion
\\
&=&(%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{l}{l}{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
l%
%EndExpansion
,%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{u}{u}{evaluatenum}}%
%BeginExpansion
u%
%EndExpansion
)\text{.}
\end{eqnarray*}
\section{Question}
\section{Comment}
Klassisk hypotespr\"{o}vning
\subsection{Setup}
$n:=6$
$\mu :=\func{rand}(10,15)$
$\sigma :=\func{rand}(3,10)/10.0$
$\epsilon :=\func{rand}(\{0,1\})$
$\limfunc{normal}=\func{NormalInv}\left( \func{rand}(1000000)/1000000.0;\mu
,\sigma \right) $
$x=\limfunc{nplaces}(\limfunc{normal},1)$
$A:=\left(
\begin{array}{cccccc}
x+\epsilon & x+\epsilon & x+\epsilon & x+\epsilon & x+\epsilon & x+\epsilon
\\
x & x & x & x & x & x%
\end{array}%
\right) $
$D_{1}:=A_{1,1}-A_{2,1}$
$D_{2}:=A_{1,2}-A_{2,2}$
$D_{3}:=A_{1,3}-A_{2,3}$
$D_{4}:=A_{1,4}-A_{2,4}$
$D_{5}:=A_{1,5}-A_{2,5}$
$D_{6}:=A_{1,6}-A_{2,6}$
$m:=\frac{1}{6}(D_{1}+D_{2}+D_{3}+D_{4}+D_{5}+D_{6})$
$s_{2}:=\frac{1}{5}\left(
D_{1}^{2}+D_{2}^{2}+D_{3}^{2}+D_{4}^{2}+D_{5}^{2}+D_{6}^{2}-6m^{2}\right) $
$\alpha :=\func{rand}(\{0.01,0.02,0.05,0.1,0.2\})$
$\tau :=\func{TInv}(1-\frac{\alpha }{2};5)$
$T:=\limfunc{nplaces}\left( \frac{m}{\sqrt{\frac{s_{2}}{6}}},3\right) $
$f:=\left\{
\begin{array}{ccc}
2 & if & \limfunc{abs}(T)\geq \tau \\
1 & if & \limfunc{abs}(T)<\tau%
\end{array}%
\right. $
\subsection{Statement}
En produktionsingenj\"{o}r vill testa om det f\"{o}religger n\aa gon
skillnad i tids\aa tg\aa ng mellan tv\aa\ metoder, $A$ och $B$, f\"{o}r att
utf\"{o}ra ett visst arbetsmoment. Med hj\"{a}lp av slumpens hj\"{a}lp v\"{a}%
ljs $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{n}{n}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
n%
%EndExpansion
$ arbetare vilka f\"{o}rst utf\"{o}r arbetsmomentet enligt metod $A$ och d%
\"{a}refter med metod $B$. Resultatet m\"{a}tt i minuter ges i nedanst\aa %
ende tabell
\[
\begin{tabular}{l|l|l}
& \multicolumn{2}{|l}{\textbf{Arbetstid}} \\ \cline{2-3}
\textbf{Arbetare} & $A$ & $B$ \\ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{1} & \multicolumn{1}{|r|}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{1,1}}{A_{1,1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{1,1}%
%EndExpansion
$} & \multicolumn{1}{|r}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{2,1}}{A_{2,1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{2,1}%
%EndExpansion
$} \\
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{2} & \multicolumn{1}{|r|}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{1,2}}{A_{1,2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{1,2}%
%EndExpansion
$} & \multicolumn{1}{|r}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{2,2}}{A_{2,2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{2,2}%
%EndExpansion
$} \\
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{|r|}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{1,3}}{A_{1,3}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{1,3}%
%EndExpansion
$} & \multicolumn{1}{|r}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{2,3}}{A_{2,3}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{2,3}%
%EndExpansion
$} \\
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{4} & \multicolumn{1}{|r|}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{1,4}}{A_{1,4}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{1,4}%
%EndExpansion
$} & \multicolumn{1}{|r}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{2,4}}{A_{2,4}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{2,4}%
%EndExpansion
$} \\
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{5} & \multicolumn{1}{|r|}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{1,5}}{A_{1,5}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{1,5}%
%EndExpansion
$} & \multicolumn{1}{|r}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{2,5}}{A_{2,5}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{2,5}%
%EndExpansion
$} \\
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{6} & \multicolumn{1}{|r|}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{1,6}}{A_{1,6}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{1,6}%
%EndExpansion
$} & \multicolumn{1}{|r}{$%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{A_{2,6}}{A_{2,6}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
A_{2,6}%
%EndExpansion
$}%
\end{tabular}%
\]%
Under antagande om normalf\"{o}rdelning testa p\aa\ signifikansniv\aa n $%
%TCIMACRO{%
%\FORMULA{\left\lfloor 100\alpha \right\rfloor }{\left\lfloor 100\alpha \right\rfloor }{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
\left\lfloor 100\alpha \right\rfloor %
%EndExpansion
$ procent om det f\"{o}religger n\aa gon skillnad mellan\ de tv\aa\ %
metoderna $A$ och $B$.
\subsection{Solution}
S\"{a}tt%
\begin{eqnarray*}
X_{Ai} &=&\text{arbetstid vid metod }A\text{ arbetare }i \\
X_{Bi} &=&\text{arbetstid vid metod }B\text{ arbetare }i
\end{eqnarray*}%
d\"{a}r $X_{Ai}\in N(\mu _{A},\sigma _{A})$ och $X_{Bi}\in N(\mu _{B},\sigma
_{B})$. Bilda den nya variabeln $D_{i}=X_{Ai}-X_{Bi}$ f\"{o}r vilken det g%
\"{a}ller att $D_{i}\in N(\mu _{A}-\mu _{B},\sigma )$ d\"{a}r $\sigma =\sqrt{%
\sigma _{A}^{2}+\sigma _{B}^{2}}$. F\"{o}r denna nya variabel g\"{a}ller f%
\"{o}ljande observerade v\"{a}rden%
\[
\begin{tabular}{l|llllll}
& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ \hline
$d$ & $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{1}}{D_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{1}%
%EndExpansion
$ & $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{2}}{D_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{2}%
%EndExpansion
$ & $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{3}}{D_{3}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{3}%
%EndExpansion
$ & $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{4}}{D_{4}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{4}%
%EndExpansion
$ & $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{5}}{D_{5}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{5}%
%EndExpansion
$ & $%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{6}}{D_{6}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{6}%
%EndExpansion
$%
\end{tabular}%
\]%
och f\"{o}r dessa finner vi%
\begin{eqnarray*}
\bar{d} &=&\frac{\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{1}}{D_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\right) +\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{2}}{D_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\right) +\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{3}}{D_{3}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{3}%
%EndExpansion
\right) +\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{4}}{D_{4}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{4}%
%EndExpansion
\right) +\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{5}}{D_{5}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{5}%
%EndExpansion
\right) +\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{6}}{D_{6}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{6}%
%EndExpansion
\right) }{6}=%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{m}{m}{evaluate} }%
%BeginExpansion
m
%EndExpansion
\\
s_{d}^{2} &=&\frac{1}{5}\left( \left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{1}}{D_{1}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{1}%
%EndExpansion
\right) ^{2}+\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{2}}{D_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\right) ^{2}+\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{3}}{D_{3}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{3}%
%EndExpansion
\right) ^{2}+\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{4}}{D_{4}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{4}%
%EndExpansion
\right) ^{2}+\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{5}}{D_{5}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{5}%
%EndExpansion
\right) ^{2}+\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{D_{6}}{D_{6}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
D_{6}%
%EndExpansion
\right) ^{2}-6\left(
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{m}{m}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
m%
%EndExpansion
\right) ^{2}\right) =%
%TCIMACRO{\FORMULA{s_{2}}{s_{2}}{evaluate}}%
%BeginExpansion
s_{2}%
%EndExpansion
\text{.}
\end{eqnarray*}
\begin{description}
\item[\textbf{Steg 1}] Vi skall testa om n\aa gon skillnad mellan metoderna f%
\"{o}religger dvs
\[
H_{0}:\mu _{A}-\mu _{B}=0\quad H_{1}:\mu _{A}-\mu _{B}\neq 0
\]
\item[\textbf{Steg 2}] Eftersom vi har ett litet stickprov och normalf\"{o}%
rdelning blir v\aa r testvariabel%
\[
T=\frac{\bar{D}}{s_{D}/\sqrt{n}}
\]%
och denna \"{a}r $t$-f\"{o}rdelad med $n-1=5$ frihetsgrader.
\item[\textbf{Steg 3}] F\"{o}rkastelseomr\aa det erh\aa lls ur ekvationen%
\begin{eqnarray*}
\alpha &=&P(\text{f\"{o}rkasta }H_{0}\text{ givet }H_{0}\text{ sann}) \\
&=&P\left( T